Karen Hellekson

June 18, 2010

Senses in Sheri S. Tepper

Filed under: essay, sf literature — Karen Hellekson @ 5:40 pm
Finding patterns in Sheri S. Tepper
Finding patterns in Sheri S. Tepper

Sheri S. Tepper has a new book slated for release in August 2010, The Waters Rising, a sequel to 1993′s A Plague of Angels. I decided to look back on Tepper’s books because I had thought, it turns out wrongly, that her books were divided into series. Surely, I thought when I learned of the new book, Plague was related to Beauty and Sideshow—archetypal worlds with areas set apart into discrete spaces—even though I knew that Sideshow was actually part of her Marjorie Westriding series, which includes Grass and Raising the Stones. Yet there is no Westriding series: Wikipedia says that this series is known as the Arbai series. Whatever the series is called, the books all take place in the same universe. Westriding appears as a character in all of them, sometimes obliquely.

I discovered that the series I’d mentally divided Tepper’s books into were all in my head: I see commonalities of theme and structure, and somehow I organize them into series. Quick Internet research reveals that apart from the Westriding/Arbai series and books published overtly as series (True Game, Marianne, and Awakeners, all fantasy and not SF), all her other SF/F books are considered stand-alone novels. It could just be that Tepper revisits her main concerns repeatedly throughout her books: ecofeminism, animal rights, woman’s rights, sentience, fractured worlds and fractured selves, sacrifice, patterns.

Still, let me describe some patterns in Tepper’s work. Here I propose two more series: the Senses series, and the Today series. They are linked through theme and structure and not through shared universe. Of course, one might propose different groupings, depending on your criteria: the Haraldson sequence, for example: both Six Moon Dance and The Family Tree mention this paragon. Or the Animal series, with The Companions and The Family Tree leaping immediately to mind. But until you can match the theme to three volumes or more, I say, it’s just a thematic link. Warning: read on at your own risk! Plot spoilers!

Senses series

The books in the Senses series have plots that importantly revolve around one of the five senses. I could only identify four of the five; the missing element is touch. At issue is the quality of the alien and how that alien is perceived by humans.

Hearing: After Long Silence (1987)

This early Tepper novel revolves around beautiful singing crystal Presences. To navigate the treacherous world of Jubal, singers must accompany travelers and sing to the Presences, to appease them and permit safe passage among the giant crystals. The key to communicating with the Presences, and proving their sentience, lies in sound and singing. The Presences must be made to sing—to speak—in words that humans can understand, to avoid the destruction of this alien life. Similarly, singing is used as a way to work toward an understanding some kind of important, elemental truth.

Sight: Six Moon Dance (1998)

The alien Timmys in this novel are invisible. Of course they are not—not really—but everyone pretends that they are, and thus they really do become invisible, with the metaphorical invisibility sliding into literal invisibility. The ability to perceive them and interact with them is used in the novel as a marker of an enlightened person, one who wishes to acknowledge fellow sentience.

Taste: Shadow’s End (1994)

On the planet Dinadh, humans perceive the evil Ularians by a hideous taste, which is described as filthy and awful. Humans who encounter them salivate; one character props her own mouth open with a wad of leaves so the saliva can flow out, a strong image that I remembered long after I’d read the book.

Smell: The Companions (2003)

The mysterious aliens on the planet Moss communicate by smell; it takes humans a while to figure out that the aliens are attempting to talk to them. A sentient dog shows the protagonist, Jewel, the way. (Another book, Six Moon Dance, also uses smell, in this case a bad smell to mark two awful characters. But they are human, if changed.)

Today series

The three volumes that comprise this series are Gibbon’s Decline and Fall (1996), The Family Tree (1997), and The Fresco (2000). I’m calling this the Today series because the novels take place in what is basically the present day (Gibbon’s was published in 1996 but is set in the year 2000), in a recognizable United States.

In these novels, ordinary women—respectively, a lawyer, a cop, and a bookstore manager—are thrown into extraordinary circumstances, and they save the day through their insight, which is informed by their gender. These novels, more overtly than many of her others (and that’s saying something), critique the direction of American politics and how they affect women and the environment. The most dramatic and hilarious example of this is in The Fresco, where male right-wing politicians are impregnated by aliens, who think that the ideological right-to-life stance will ensure the safety of their offspring.

One criticism I have of Tepper’s work is that she tends to the deus ex machina ending: rational, compassionate aliens come down and save the day! But my recent review of her novels leads me to recast this in a kinder way. In the books in the Today series in particular, the alien-reconstructed world is a metaphor for hope. Aliens view humans as outsiders, of course, which is why the alien intelligences require native guides. The aliens’ distance and their humane rationality float above humanity’s inward-looking gross incompetence in managing its own affairs.

We need to become like the aliens, Tepper suggests. We need to step back, view ourselves dispassionately, identify suffering, separate social constructions from truth, and attach moral meaning to things like gender roles by placing sentience above its embodiment, be it woman or dog or crystal or alien. We may then construct a story, a worldview, of humanity as we would like it to be. Tepper would have us treat sentience, in whatever form it takes, with reverence. Next we weave, or sing, or dance, or write that utopian desire into being.

Tepper’s books are a good start to that project.

This text and the image, which I created, are copyrighted under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. This post was originally written on June 18, 2010. It may be freely copied anywhere. If you copy this post, please also copy the image and host it yourself. If you read this document at a site other than its original, I may not see any comments you might append, and I’d love to hear from you. Please comment at the original blog post if you wish me to see your remarks.

April 3, 2010

2010 Philip K. Dick Award announced

Filed under: sf literature — Karen Hellekson @ 7:12 am

I’m pleased to say that the winner of the 2010 Philip K. Dick Award has been announced. The award is for the best SF novel originally published in paperback.

The award went to Bitter Angels by first-time novelist C. L. Anderson (Ballantine Books Spectra), an interesting twist on the military SF genre. Special citation was given to Cyberabad Days by Ian McDonald (Pyr).

Bitter Angels cover

The back cover blurb reads thus (from Amazon.com):

An Imploding Star System. A Murdered Galactic Spy. A Woman Seeking the Truth—and Finding the Unbelievable…

The Erasmus System is a sprawling realm of slavery, smugglers, spies—and constant, creeping decrepitude. Here everyone who is not part of the ruling Four Families is a slave of one kind or another. But the Guardians, a special-forces branch inside the United World Government for Earth, have deemed Erasmus a “hot spot.” Somehow, it is believed, this failing colony intends to launch a war upon the solar system.

Ex-Field Commander Terese Drajeske, now a mother of three, has been called back to active duty and sent to Erasmus, ostensibly to investigate the murder of her colleague—and friend—Bianca Fayette. At first blush, the death defies explanation: Bianca was immortal. But beneath that single murder lies a twisted foundation of deceptions. Suddenly Terese is plunged into a vortex of shattered lives, endemic deceit, and one dreadful secret. In this society without hope, someone has put into motion a plan that will cast humanity into chaos. And Terese, who has given up her family and her sanity to prevent war, may be asked to make the ultimate sacrifice….

The 2009 judges were Daniel Abraham, Eileen Gunn, Karen Hellekson, Elaine Isaak, and Marc Laidlaw.

The official press release is available at PhilipKDickAward.org.

This text is copyrighted under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. If you duplicate the post, please also copy the picture and host it yourself. This post was originally written on April 3, 2010. It may be freely copied anywhere. If you read this document a site other than its original, I may not see any comments you might append, and I’d love to hear from you. Please comment at the original blog post if you wish me to see your remarks.

January 16, 2010

Philip K. Dick Award nominees announced

Filed under: sf literature — Karen Hellekson @ 7:39 pm

The press release has gone out listing the nominees for the 2009 Philip K. Dick Award. The winner will be announced at Norwescon 33 on Friday, April 2, 2010. I was pleased to sit on the jury for the 2009 award. Here’s the portion of the press release that provides the short list:

The judges of the 2009 Philip K. Dick Award and the Philadelphia SF Society, along with the Philip K. Dick Trust, are pleased to announce seven nominated works that comprise the final ballot for the award:

BITTER ANGELS by C. L. Anderson (Ballantine Books/Spectra)
THE PRISONER by Carlos J. Cortes (Ballantine Books/Spectra)
THE REPOSSESSION MAMBO by Eric Garcia (Harper)
THE DEVIL’S ALPHABET by Daryl Gregory (Del Rey)
CYBERABAD DAYS by Ian McDonald (Pyr)
CENTURIES AGO AND VERY FAST by Rebecca Ore (Aqueduct Press)
PROPHETS by S. Andrew Swann (DAW Books)

First prize and any special citations will be announced on Friday, April 2, 2010 at Norwescon 33 at the Doubletree Seattle Airport Hotel, SeaTac, Washington.

The Philip K. Dick Award is presented annually with the support of the Philip K. Dick Trust for distinguished science fiction published in paperback original form in the United States. The award is sponsored by the Philadelphia Science Fiction Society and the Philip K. Dick Trust and the award ceremony is sponsored by the NorthWest Science Fiction Society. Last year’s winners were EMISSARIES FROM THE DEAD by Adam-Troy Castro (Eos Books) and TERMINAL MIND by David Walton (Meadowhawk Press). The 2009 judges are Daniel Abraham (chair), Eileen Gunn, Karen Hellekson, Elaine Isaak, and Marc Laidlaw.

UPDATE 2010-01-17 to add: The official announcement is now up at the PKD Award Web site.

This text is copyrighted under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. This post was originally written on January 16, 2010. It may be freely copied anywhere. If you read this document at a site other than its original, I may not see any comments you might append, and I’d love to hear from you. Please comment at the original blog post if you wish me to see your remarks.

October 30, 2008

War of the Worlds

Filed under: sf literature — Karen Hellekson @ 3:38 pm

On this date in 1938, as a Halloween treat, the Mercury Theater on the Air broadcast their version of H. G. Wells’s War of the Worlds. The rest, as you know, is history.

This audio drama is in the public domain and may be obtained here. Check it out! Enjoy!

July 27, 2007

Reclaiming Heinlein

Filed under: essay, sf literature — Karen Hellekson @ 5:51 pm

This is cross-posted at my LiveJournal blog here. Do feel free to comment in either space.

1. Reclaiming Heinlein

[1.1] At the 2007 SFRA/Heinlein Centennial meeting, at a panel about Heinlein’s importance in the field of SF literature chaired by prominent SF writers, several people in the audience noted that Heinlein was their gateway into SF. They wished their children, grandchildren, nieces, or nephews to share the joy they remembered with Heinlein’s juveniles, and so they gave them as gifts. But, as many audience members noted, these children perceived Heinlein as irrelevant, and they did not enjoy the texts.

[1.2] Why would this be? Some people at the panel thought that it was the fault of the children—that they were not sophisticated enough readers, perhaps; or their minds had been taken over by video games, rendering them unfit for texts that require some kind of attention span. Others thought that the texts dealt with things (like…Nazis) that current children find irrelevant.

[1.3] Although it certainly seems a truism that excellent literature is always relevant, if only for the beauty of its writing, I’d argue something quite different. Yes, Heinlein is dated. His sexual politics in particular are problematic: his characterizations of female characters are definitely a product of their time, and they haven’t aged well; and as the panelists and audience agreed, Heinlein’s later writing wasn’t as fine as his middle-era stuff. Still, we read, for example, Shakespeare and consider him vitally important.

[1.4] I argue that there are two reasons why we consider Shakespeare relevant for today. First, and most importantly, Shakespeare is crucially important in understanding the English-language literature that came after. There are so many allusions and citations by other authors to Shakespeare that to know nothing about Shakespeare means that you will miss the joke, an entire other layer of meaning implied with a single phrase that evokes an entire other text. You simply can’t hear “to be or not to be” or think of Juliet on a balcony without the entirety of the texts tingeing the context.

[1.5] But second, we continually reinvent Shakespeare, and thus we ensure he remains relevant. In short, Shakespeare is relevant because we make him so. Producers stage Shakespeare interestingly, perhaps by setting it in the Nazi era or some other time period, to comment on current events or to imply certain things about the characters; they may use casting choices laden with contemporary meaning; and scholars analyze Shakespeare in terms he’d find most surprising, such as feminism and deconstruction.

[1.6] If Heinlein is to be relevant to today’s youth, then we must make him so. As teachers, we must reclaim the texts in such a way that it is placed within a framework that new readers will find meaningful. (Perhaps a dense deconstructive or feminist or posthuman reading of Heinlein’s juveniles is in order? Although I’m sure such texts exist and I simply know nothing about them.) Shakespeare’s legacy informs countless other texts; not so with Heinlein. The question then becomes, is Heinlein worth the trouble of reclaiming? Is his work so important to the field of SF that we need to ensure that Heinlein remains perennially relevant? And if he is so darn important, then why isn’t this work being done?

[1.7] I admit that my answer to my question above—is Heinlein worth reclaiming?—would be no. It’s hard to look at a cultural moment so close in time to ours, without the benefit of hindsight, but Heinlein’s prose is not ravishing, his characters timeless, his struggles truly epic, even if they take place on the Moon. It was Philip K. Dick, after all, not Heinlein, who was chosen to expand the pantheon of canonical American writers in the Library of America. I would read Heinlein not for the sheer joy of it, but because he is an important SF figure at a particular moment in time. In short, I would read his books for historical completeness. Of course it’s hard to say where Heinlein will be in twenty years’ time. Dick seems relevant today because he deals with ontological concerns that relate to the human condition. That translates better into today’s climate, although he shares with Heinlein the problem with women characters (when they appear) so endemic in work of, say, the 1950s. Heinlein writes adventure stories about boys and men (and occasionally girls and women), often to teach a lesson, but it’s hard to make didacticism compelling. That’s part of the problem.

[1.8] Of course, it’s unfair to compare Heinlein with Shakespeare. Still, my analogy remains valid: if Heinlein is really that important in the SF pantheon, then we must ensure that he remains so by doing the work that goes along with handing someone a book—work that is apparently not in the process of being done, if the anecdotes told at the panel hold true. Instead of a pat on the head and an “Enjoy!” (which is all that is necessary for Harry Potter), the text may need a gloss: “This one is about individualism,” one may advise; or “When I read this, I thought x, but it strikes me that you might find y more relevant.” Certain books, such as Starship Troopers, may seem more relevant in today’s era of war, of fighting an enemy without ever winning. Teachers need to teach his work, and scholars need to study it for it to be truly reclaimed.

[1.9] Heinlein needs to be analyzed in such a way that we find relevance for today, not merely remembered for its importance at a crucial time in our lives—that golden era when we discover SF and its boundless possibilities, and the direction of our lives is changed forever. That’s what we’re remembering when we hand Heinlein to children. We aren’t remembering Heinlein’s greatness as much as feeling nostalgia for a moment of wonder. To foster that sense of wonder in children today, we should consider choosing another text.

Theme: Shocking Blue Green. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.